Quick Delicious Homemade Cinnamon Rolls
I found this recipe on the internet and tried it tonight. It was fabulous. You can easily make these start to finish in less than 2 hours including baking time. They taste the same as the ones that take ALL day to make. Try em out.
2 cups of warm water
1/2 cup sugar
4 teaspoons dry yeast (or two packages of dry yeast)
2 eggs
1 teaspoon salt
1/3 cup oil
6 to 7 cups of flour
Vanilla Glaze:
1/2 cup butter
2 cups powdered sugar
1 1/2 tsp vanilla
2-4 tbsp hot water
Melt butter in a small pot. Add vanilla and powdered sugar. Add water one tbsp at a time until smooth and desired thickness.
Dissolve the yeast in the warm water. Let sit for a minute or two. Add the sugar and salt. Mix. Add the cooking oil (or shortening), 2 eggs, 2 cups of flour and beat until smooth.
Stir in 3 more cups of flour. Begin kneading the dough, adding the final cup of flour. If the dough seems too sticky, knead in more flour, a quarter to a half cup at a time.
Let the dough "rest" for 15 to 20 minutes.
Roll the dough into a rectangle that's 24 to 30 inches long by about 16 inches wide. Spread with soft butter and sprinkle with cinnamon and sugar. Starting at the wide end, roll into a log.
Cut the cinnamon rolls into 24 equal sized slices and place into two greased 9 x 13 pans. Put in a warm place to rise for 45 minutes
.
Bake at 350 degrees for 25 minutes (or until the cinnamon rolls are golden brown).
Allow to cool for 5 minutes and then turn out of the pans.
Spoon warm vanilla glaze over the warm rolls. Enjoy!
This recipes makes two dozen cinnamon rolls. If you want REALLY BIG cinnamon rolls, cut into 12 equal pieces 2 inches wide. (That is the way I did them and they were FABULOUS!!)
Total amount of time needed from start to finish (including time to bake) is about 2 hours.
Comments
really good.
Review my blog post - binary options trading
I'm new to the blog world but I'm trying to get started and set up my
own. Do you need any html coding knowledge to make your own blog?
Any help would be really appreciated!
Take a look at my blog :: what is cedarfinance.com
Republican members of the Gang of Eight had made clear in the days before the vote that the LGBT provisions - if included [url=http://www.agoshow.net/Tigers-26-Boesch-red-2010-All-Star-Jerseys-34/]Tigers 26 Boesch red 2010 All Star Jerseys[/url] - would be a dealbreaker for GOP supporters of the delicate bipartisan compromise. But gay rights organizations said the inclusion of the protections for LGBT individuals is a crucial social justice issue.
The Human Rights Campaign, a leading gay rights group, called opposition to [url=http://www.agoshow.net/2009-All-Star-Philadephia-Phillis-26-Chase-Utley-Red-Jerseys-18/]2009 All Star Philadephia Phillis 26 Chase Utley Red Jerseys[/url] Leahy's proposal "deplorable" and vowed to keep up the fight on the Senate floor.
"We are extremely disappointed that our allies did not put their anti-LGBT colleagues on the spot and force a vote on the measure that remains popular with the American people," the organization said in a statement. "We will continue to work hard to include bi-national same-sex couples [url=http://www.agoshow.net/Red-Sox-34-David-Ortiz-Home-Cool-Base-White-2010-All-Star-Jerseys-85/]Red Sox 34 David Ortiz Home Cool Base White 2010 All Star Jerseys[/url] as the bill moves to the floor and remain committed to the underlying principles of inclusive and comprehensive immigration reform."
Rachel Tiven, the president of immigrant advocacy group Immigration Equality, said there should be shame on both sides of the political aisle" for the move.
"Despite widespread support from business, labor, faith, Latino and Asian-American advocates, Senators abandoned LGBT families without a vote," she said.
South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, one of the Gang of Eight negotiators, affirmed that the amendment would fracture the "strong but fragile coalition" nurtured by the bipartisan group.
"When it comes to passing this immigration bill, to interject a redefinition of marriage would be a bridge too far," he said.
Before Leahy announced the withholding of the amendment, Gang of Eight members Dick Durbin and Chuck Schumer, both Democrats with strong records of supporting gay rights, each expressed anguish at the prospect of voting against the measure to preserve [url=http://www.agoshow.net/Brewers-1-Hart-blue-2010-All-Star-Jerseys-31/]Brewers 1 Hart blue 2010 All Star Jerseys[/url] the chances of passage of the larger bill.
"I believe this is the [url=http://www.agoshow.net/Cardinals-50-Adam-Wainwright-Road-Cool-Base-Grey-2010-All-Star-Jerseys-94/]Cardinals 50 Adam Wainwright Road Cool Base Grey 2010 All Star Jerseys[/url] wrong moment. This is the wrong bill," said Durbin.
Schumer acknowledged that current immigration policy towards LGBT foreign nationals amounts to "rank discrimination"
But, he added,"I cannot support this amendment if it would bring down this bill."
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat from California, said that she believes there is a "very good chance" that the Supreme Court will find the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional this summer, largely addressing the concerns of the LGBT community when it comes to protections for binational couples.
"I am for what Sen. Leahy is proposing," she added. "I would just implore you to hold off on this amendment at this time."
Explore related topics: , ,
[url=http://xi.purifying.info/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=710517]more[/url]